Category: Marketing

When Should We Update Our Website?

Posted on by

The Case for Continuous Optimization

When I onboard new clients, one admission comes up in almost every first conversation: their website is overdue for a refresh. They know it, their team knows it, and most critically, their visitors know it.

They’re right to be concerned. For most businesses, a website isn’t just a digital brochure; it’s the highest-leverage tool you have for attracting, qualifying, and converting leads. 75% of consumers judge a business’s credibility based on its website design, and 94% of first impressions are design-related. With stakes that high, a stale website isn’t a minor inconvenience, it’s a direct threat to revenue.

The instinct most businesses have is to schedule a full redesign. And while that’s sometimes necessary, it rarely solves the underlying problem. What most companies actually need is a smarter operating model for their website — one that treats it as a living business asset, not a periodic construction project.

The “Redesign Every Few Years” Myth

The conventional wisdom that websites should be fully redesigned every two to three years has been circulating for decades. It holds some logic — audiences evolve, design trends shift, and technology advances. But this timeline reflects a fundamental misunderstanding of what a website is actually for.

Your website isn’t a statement about your company. It’s a tool for your customers. The moment you stop treating it as one, it starts working against you.

Today’s analytics platforms give businesses granular, real-time data on exactly how users navigate, where they drop off, and what’s preventing them from converting. Waiting two or three years to act on that data isn’t conservative; it’s costly.

Growth-Driven Design: A Better Operating Model

Growth-Driven Design (GDD) is the strategic alternative to the traditional redesign cycle. Rather than investing a large budget into a high-risk overhaul every few years, GDD operates through continuous, data-informed improvements — smaller in scope, faster to execute, and directly tied to measurable outcomes.

Think of it as running sprints instead of marathons. Each sprint addresses your highest-priority issues, ships quickly, and generates new data to inform the next round of improvements.

This approach has real, measurable advantages. Websites that take over two seconds to load risk losing 60% of their visitors, and even a one-second delay can result in 7% fewer conversions. With GDD, you’re constantly identifying and resolving these friction points rather than letting them compound for years between redesigns.

In practice, GDD sprints might look like this:

  • Analytics reveal that users aren’t interacting with a key e-commerce link, so you reposition it to better align with the buyer journey
  • Heatmap data shows a CTA is being overlooked, prompting you to relocate it to a higher-converting position on the page
  • A broken email capture flow is identified and fixed, with a redirect added to keep users engaged with relevant content

None of these changes require a $60,000–$75,000 website overhaul. Redesigning a large website with more than 150 pages can cost anywhere from $36,000 to $75,000. GDD dramatically reduces that exposure by distributing improvements over time, keeping you perpetually under budget at the 12- and 24-month mark.

traditional web design vs growth-driven design isualization from HubSpot:
Visualization from HubSpot.

Starting with a Strong Foundation

GDD doesn’t eliminate the need for upfront strategic work, it changes what comes after it.

The kick-off phase still requires defining your target buyer personas, auditing your information architecture, mapping customer journeys, and setting performance baselines. The difference is what happens once the site goes live. Instead of walking away for two years, you enter a continuous cycle of measuring, learning, and improving.

This model requires genuine alignment between your marketing and sales teams. Your website changes should be driven by pipeline data, not aesthetic preferences. Before any sprint begins, share performance reports across teams and establish clear, measurable goals for what each update is meant to achieve.

The Role of AI and Modern Analytics

What’s changed significantly since GDD was first popularized is the sophistication of the tools now available to support it. As of 2025, 93% of web designers are incorporating AI tools into their design processes, using them to streamline iteration, generate assets, and surface optimization opportunities faster than ever before.

This means there’s less excuse than ever to wait. AI-powered tools can analyze user behavior, flag underperforming page elements, and even generate copy or design variants for A/B testing — compressing what used to take weeks into days.

Why This Matters for SEO

One underappreciated benefit of continuous website improvement is its compounding effect on search visibility. Search engines favor sites that are regularly updated with relevant, high-quality content and that demonstrate strong user engagement signals — low bounce rates, longer session durations, and high page-load performance.

Effective web design directly impacts SEO by improving site navigation and speed, leading to longer user engagement and better search engine rankings. A GDD cadence, by its nature, keeps these signals healthy over time whereas sites that sit untouched for years tend to drift down in rankings as competitors outpace them.

The Bottom Line

The question isn’t really when you should update your website. The answer to that is: regularly, and with intention.

The more important question is how you structure that work. If you’re still operating on a two-to-three-year redesign cycle, you’re leaving money on the table and ceding competitive ground to businesses that are iterating faster than you.

Treat your website as what it actually is: a dynamic tool that serves your customers, reflects your current market positioning, and should be improving every single month. If you don’t have the internal bandwidth to support that cadence, find an agency partner who can help you build and execute a GDD roadmap that aligns with your business goals.

The days of building a website and walking away are over.

Which Conversion Attribution Model is Best for You?

Posted on by Leave a comment

Modern marketing runs on a diverse mix of channels and tactics, each playing a different role at different stages of the buyer journey. The challenge for marketers has always been the same: how do you prove which tactics are actually driving results?

That’s where conversion attribution modeling comes in. It’s a set of rules that determines how credit for a conversion gets assigned across the various touchpoints in a customer’s path. But in 2026, the rules themselves are being rewritten. 63% of marketing leaders now report increased pressure from CFOs to prove campaign effectiveness, up from 52% the year prior, and 38% of marketers say attribution is their number one analytics challenge, while 64% of CMOs say it directly influences their budgeting decisions.

The model you choose shapes how you see your marketing performance entirely. Here is a breakdown of where each model stands in 2026.

The Classic Models: Still Useful, Still Limited

The foundational attribution models haven’t disappeared, but their role has changed. Think of them as lenses, not verdicts. Each one answers a specific question, and none of them tells the whole story on its own.

Last Click Attribution assigns 100% of the credit to the final touchpoint before conversion. It’s the most familiar model and still widely used, but last-click captures only the final step of a purchase journey and ignores the channels that sparked discovery or built the trust that made the sale possible.

First Click Attribution gives full credit to the first touchpoint a user had with your brand. It’s useful for understanding which channels drive initial awareness and pull net-new prospects into your funnel, but like last click, it ignores everything that happens in between.

Linear Attribution distributes conversion credit equally across every touchpoint before conversion. It provides a more balanced view of the full journey, and 74% of high-growth companies now use multi-touch attribution of some kind, with linear often serving as the entry point for teams making that transition.

Time Decay Attribution distributes credit across all touchpoints but weights those closest to the conversion more heavily. It’s well suited for longer sales cycles where recency of engagement is a meaningful signal.

Position-Based (U-Shaped) Attribution is a hybrid model that weights the first and last interactions most heavily while distributing the remaining credit across the middle touchpoints. U-shaped models are the most common attribution approach among B2B SaaS companies, making it a natural fit for complex, multi-touch buying journeys.

Where Attribution Has Moved in 2026

Three major forces have fundamentally changed how leading marketing teams approach attribution today.

1. AI-Driven and Data-Driven Attribution

Rather than applying fixed rules, AI-driven models use machine learning to analyze actual conversion paths. AI uses Markov Chain and Shapley Value algorithms to quantify how each interaction contributes to conversion, distributing credit based on statistical probability rather than predetermined rules.

Google Ads and GA4 now default to data-driven attribution. Data-driven attribution powered by Google AI accurately assigns credit to each interaction in real time, and 8 in 10 online purchases involve multiple touchpoints. Additionally, marketing teams using AI attribution typically discover that 30 to 40% of their budget was flowing to channels that appeared valuable under traditional attribution but actually contributed minimally to revenue.

2. Incrementality Testing

Incrementality testing is experiencing a renaissance as marketers seek more reliable measurement. Incrementality experiments split your audience into two groups, one exposed to ads and one not, then compare metrics to give you a deeper understanding of your ads’ true effectiveness beyond what attribution alone can reveal.

This is particularly valuable as third-party tracking becomes less reliable. Incrementality testing tells you not just what happened, but whether your marketing actually caused it.

3. Media Mix Modeling (MMM)

MMM has surged in popularity as a privacy-first measurement solution. MMMs are “once again becoming an increasingly important part of an effective, comprehensive measurement strategy” as privacy and regulatory environments continue to evolve.

Open-source tools have made MMM far more accessible. In January 2025, Google made Meridian publicly available as a free, open-source Bayesian causal inference framework that uses aggregated, anonymous data rather than cookies, ensuring privacy compliance. Meta’s Robyn remains a widely adopted alternative, particularly for teams running campaigns across Meta platforms.

Leading brands are now combining MMM with real-time attribution data to create measurement frameworks that are both privacy-compliant and actionable.

The Privacy Factor You Can’t Ignore

Apple’s ATT framework, Consent Mode v2 mandates, and proliferating state privacy laws have already degraded tracking infrastructure, regardless of what happens with third-party cookies in Chrome. First-party data infrastructure is no longer optional. It is the foundation that every attribution approach depends on.

Attribution models also don’t stay accurate forever. Channel mix, creative, and audience behavior all shift over time. Teams that don’t revisit their attribution setup regularly end up making budget decisions based on outdated conditions.

Which Approach Should You Use?

The most damaging mistake in modern attribution is over-reliance on any single model. Companies that switch from single-touch to multi-touch attribution see an average 22% improvement in budget efficiency.

A practical framework for 2026

  • Use last click or first click as a quick diagnostic lens for closing or awareness performance.
  • Use linear, time decay, or position-based to understand mid-funnel contribution across longer sales cycles.
  • Use data-driven attribution in GA4 or Google Ads as your primary optimization signal if you have sufficient conversion volume.
  • Use incrementality testing to validate whether your campaigns are actually causing results, not just correlating with them.
  • Use MMM for strategic, longer-term budget allocation decisions across channels, especially where user-level tracking is limited.

The goal isn’t to find the one correct model. It’s to stop making expensive budget decisions based on an incomplete view of how your marketing is actually working.

The Real Purpose of Your B2B Website

Posted on by

Think back to the B2B world before the internet. Prospects evaluated your brand through advertising, brochures, and most importantly through your sales team. Reps were the primary trust-builders, guiding buyers from awareness through decision. Existing customers stayed engaged through direct support interactions, training, and regular check-ins.

That model is gone. And your website needs to reflect what replaced it.

According to Gartner, B2B buyers spend only 17% of their total buying time in direct contact with potential vendors, meaning roughly 80% of the journey happens without a salesperson involved at all. Your website isn’t a brochure. It’s doing the job your sales team used to do, and for most of the buyer’s journey, it’s doing it alone.

Here are the three core purposes your B2B website must serve.

1. Customer Support and Upsell Engagement

Let’s start with your existing customers, an often under-optimized audience on B2B websites.

A 2024 Gartner survey found that 73% of B2B buyers actively avoid suppliers who send irrelevant outreach, which means pushing customers back into traditional sales motions often backfires. What they actually want is frictionless access to information on their own terms. Your website should be the first place they go, not the last resort.

Self-serve support content is the foundation. This means a searchable knowledge base, recorded training and product walkthroughs, product cross-reference tools where applicable, and clearly surfaced contact options including live chat. The goal is deflection from your support queue and confidence from your customer. Both happen when the right content is easy to find.

Make your performance data visible too. Customer satisfaction scores, first-contact resolution rates, and SLA benchmarks are trust signals for prospects as much as they are for customers. Put them where both audiences can see them.

Upsell and cross-sell content should live in a distinct space from your prospect-facing messaging. An existing customer who trusts you doesn’t need to be re-educated on your brand. They need to understand what’s new, what upgrades are available, and what adjacent problems you can help them solve. Transactional email sequences, customer newsletters, and logged-in portal experiences are all opportunities to serve this content at the right moment.

And don’t overlook your field and support teams. The people closest to your customers are often the first to identify expansion opportunities. Build a formal process for capturing and routing those signals to sales.

2. Prospect Engagement: Think in Landing Pages

The biggest mistake B2B companies make with prospect-facing content is treating their website as a single destination. It isn’t. It’s a collection of entry points, and each one needs to be built with intent.

A 2024 Forrester study found that 92% of B2B buyers start their journey with at least one vendor already in mind, and 41% have a single preferred vendor selected before formal evaluation even begins. That means your website’s job isn’t just to convert visitors. It’s to make sure you’re being found and building preference before buyers initiate contact.

Your homepage is one landing page, not the landing page. It needs to speak directly to your buyers’ pain points and use cases, not tell the story of your company. Cover your logo and ask: could this content appear on any competitor’s site? If the answer is yes, your homepage is not doing its job.

Beyond your homepage, every targeted campaign you run, whether paid search, LinkedIn, or email, should drive traffic to a purpose-built page that directly addresses what that audience was looking for. If a prospect arrives from a specific search and has to hunt for relevance, they’ll leave. Research consistently shows that if users don’t find what they need within the first 10 to 15 seconds, they’re gone.

SEO is non-negotiable. 71% of B2B buyers start their research with a Google search, and organic visibility determines whether you’re even in the consideration set. Modern SEO goes far beyond metadata. It requires a deliberate content strategy that answers the questions your buyers are actively searching, structured in a way that search engines can understand and surface. For B2B companies, this means investing in problem-oriented content at the top of the funnel: trend analyses, buyer guides, use-case-specific pages, and comparison content.

A few additional principles worth operationalizing:

  • Marketing must own the website. Any site that requires IT intervention to update content is a liability. Your marketing team needs full autonomy to create, edit, and test pages without a ticket queue.
  • Answer the questions your buyers are actually asking. Map your top five buyer questions per segment and verify that your homepage and key landing pages address them directly.
  • Paid search remains essential for early visibility. Use it to establish presence while your organic authority is still building.
  • AI is reshaping how buyers research. 94% of B2B buyers now use LLMs during their buying process, and AI-generated search overviews are increasingly the first thing buyers see. Structuring your content clearly and authoritatively improves your visibility in both traditional and AI-driven search results.

3. eCommerce: An Increasingly Strategic Priority

For B2B companies that sell products directly, eCommerce has moved from a nice-to-have to a core revenue channel. Digital channels are projected to account for 56% of U.S. B2B revenue in 2025, up from just 32% in 2020, and buyer comfort with high-value remote transactions continues to grow.

This is a large enough topic to warrant its own dedicated strategy, including technology selection, pricing transparency, security, and procurement workflow integration. If it applies to your business, bring in experienced outside counsel early. The cost of getting it wrong far outweighs the cost of doing it right from the start.

The Investment That Pays Compound Returns

Your B2B website is not a line item to be reviewed once a year. It’s the primary surface through which your buyers evaluate, shortlist, and develop a preference for you, often long before a salesperson enters the picture.

The investment required to do it well spans market and audience segmentation, value proposition development, information architecture, ongoing SEO and content, and continuous analytics-driven improvement. That’s not a project with a finish line. It’s an operating discipline.

When it works, it works around the clock: qualifying prospects, supporting customers, and building the kind of pre-contact brand trust that wins 80% of deals before the first sales conversation even happens.

The B2B Marketing Investments You Can’t Skip (Even When Resources Are Tight)

Posted on by Leave a comment

Part 3 of the Solo Marketer Playbook series. This post covers the foundational investments that make every campaign and tactic work better. Start with Part 1: Being a one-person marketing department if you haven’t already.

As a one-person or small-staff B2B marketing department, you live with a constant tension: the pressure to execute campaigns that are visible to the rest of the organization, and the quieter, less glamorous work that makes those campaigns actually produce results.

Your leadership team wants to see activity. They want to measure every dollar. What they often can’t see is that skipping the foundational work — the internal investments that no one outside marketing ever notices — is exactly what causes campaigns to underperform. You end up spending money on tactics that are built on an unstable base, and the results reflect it.

This post covers the four foundational investments that solo and small-team B2B marketers cannot afford to skip, no matter how tight the budget or timeline. These are not optional extras. They are the infrastructure that makes everything else work.

1. Customer Conversation Mapping

Before you write a single piece of copy, run a single ad, or publish a single piece of content, you need to understand how your buyers think, talk, and decide. Customer conversation mapping is the process that gives you that understanding in a form you can actually use.

This is not a solo exercise. It has to be a structured collaboration with the sales team members who have the deepest knowledge of your current market — the people who are in conversations with prospects every day. An outside facilitator is valuable here: someone who can keep the group honest and prevent the collective blind spots that develop when a team has been talking about its own products for too long.

The goal is to produce a conversation map for each customer segment you target. A conversation map documents the specific pain points driving each segment’s buying behavior, the underlying drivers behind those pain points, and the unique value propositions (UVPs) that genuinely resonate with that segment. When you map pain points across segments, you often find overlaps — one UVP that addresses multiple pains, or one pain point that shows up across multiple segments but needs different framing.

According to CMI’s 2024 B2B content marketing research, only 53% of top-performing B2B marketers have a documented content strategy — and among average or underperforming teams, the number drops significantly lower. The ones who document consistently outperform those who don’t. Conversation mapping is where that documentation begins.

What you end up with is foundational documentation for two things: messaging that engages each customer segment in the language of their own problems, and conversation points your sales team can actually use when they’re in the room with a prospect. Done well, it closes the gap between what marketing says and what sales says — a gap that costs B2B companies leads and revenue every day.

If your messaging currently feels generic, or if sales and marketing are sending conflicting signals to the market, this is where to start.

2. Identifying Your True Unique Value Propositions

In all the years I have spent in and around marketing, identifying a company’s genuine unique value propositions is consistently the hardest thing to get right. Most companies think they’ve done this work. Most haven’t.

Here’s a simple test: go to your company homepage, cover the logo, and ask whether anything on that page could only be claimed by your company. Could a competitor put their logo up there and have it still be true? If the answer is yes, you don’t have a unique value proposition yet. You have a category description.

The standard I aim for is what I call a “category of one.” Unless your business model is built on volume and price competition, you need to find something that moves you away from direct comparison — something that makes prospects see you as offering something distinct, rather than as one option among several.

A striking 2024 Dentsu study of over 3,500 B2B buyers found that 68% of buyers say B2B brands are not communicating a distinct position — even though 71% of those same brands’ marketers believe they are. That gap between internal confidence and external perception is exactly where positioning work breaks down, and exactly why it has to be grounded in real buyer input, not internal assumption.

A few realities worth naming here:

  • You cannot always be a category of one. Some markets are genuinely crowded. But you can almost always find a specific angle, audience, use case, or delivery model where you can claim something real and defensible.
  • Your UVPs have to be true. Claiming differentiation you can’t deliver is worse than having no differentiation at all — it sets an expectation that erodes trust the moment a prospect becomes a customer.
  • This work has to be redone periodically. Markets shift, competitors copy you, and what was once distinctive becomes table stakes. Build in a cadence for revisiting your positioning at least annually.

The output of this work feeds directly into everything downstream: your messaging, your content, your sales enablement materials, your ad copy. If your UVPs are vague or borrowed, everything built on top of them will be too.

3. Content Development Built Around Your Messaging

Here’s the sequence that most marketing teams get wrong: they produce content first, then try to figure out the messaging later. It needs to be the other way around.

Content development comes after conversation mapping and UVP work — not before. Once you know what your buyers care about, what language they use, and what genuinely differentiates you, you have what you need to create content that actually lands.

For a one-person or small marketing team, you are responsible for two distinct types of content:

Sales enablement content

This is internal-facing content: the materials your sales team uses in conversations. Key facts, competitive positioning, messaging frameworks, objection handling, segment-specific talking points. Its job is to make every sales conversation sharper and more consistent with what marketing is putting into the market.

Customer-facing content

This is external-facing content: everything your prospects and customers encounter. Blog posts, whitepapers, case studies, emails, social content, landing pages. The most important discipline here is that your defined messages must be at the center of all of it. Not as boilerplate repeated verbatim, but as the gravitational core that every piece orbits.

Segment specificity matters more than most teams realize. Your buyers should be able to read your content and immediately recognize that you understand their world. An automotive buyer reading generic manufacturing content will disengage. An automotive buyer reading content that speaks directly to the pressures, terminology, and priorities of automotive procurement will stay. The core content can often be the same, with a layer of segment-specific language and examples applied on top.

Content also needs to meet buyers at every stage of the journey: those who are just becoming aware of your company, those actively evaluating options, and those ready to make a decision. Each stage requires different content formats and different calls to action.

A well-structured website is the delivery system for all of this — and it deserves its own strategic attention. I cover the full scope of how your B2B website should work as a content and conversion asset in a dedicated post.

4. A Website Built Around How Buyers Actually Find You

Your website is the last item on this list because it depends on everything above it. Without clear messaging and defined UVPs, a website review is just a design exercise. With them, it becomes a high-leverage investment that works for you around the clock.

There are three primary ways a prospect finds their way to your site: they already know your name (direct), they searched for something related to a problem they’re trying to solve (organic or paid search), or they responded to an offer you placed in front of them (ad, email, media placement). Each pathway requires a different kind of landing experience.

Your homepage is one landing page, not the landing page

It will primarily reach people who already know you. Design it accordingly: clear value proposition above the fold, fast paths to contact, and content that builds confidence for existing customers and warm prospects. Cover your logo and ask whether any competitor could claim the same page. If they could, rewrite it.

Search-driven pages need to match intent precisely

Whether a visitor arrives through paid search or organic rankings, they had a specific intent when they searched. The page they land on has to meet that intent directly. A prospect who clicked on an offer about food safety compliance should land on a page that immediately addresses food safety compliance, not your homepage where it’s buried three clicks deep. A holistic approach to SEO and search intent is what makes this work at scale.

Marketing must own the website

Any site that requires an IT ticket to update content is a liability. As a one-person or small team, you need full autonomy to create, test, and publish pages without a queue. If that’s not your current reality, fixing it is itself a non-negotiable investment.

Measurement has to be built in from the start

You cannot improve what you cannot measure. At a minimum, UTM parameters on all links, goal tracking in GA4, and a basic lead source attribution framework should be in place before you spend a dollar on paid traffic. For a deeper look at how to think about proving marketing’s impact, my post on choosing the right conversion attribution model walks through the options in detail.

Why the Order of These Investments Matters

These four investments are not independent of each other. They build in sequence, and skipping steps has compounding consequences.

Conversation mapping informs your UVPs. Your UVPs define your messaging. Your messaging shapes your content. Your content determines what your website needs to say and how it needs to be organized. If you jump straight to website redesign or content production without doing the upstream work, you’ll likely end up redoing it — or wondering why it isn’t converting.

The hardest part of this for a one-person marketing department is that none of these investments are immediately visible to the organization. You can’t point to a campaign launch or a new ad. What you can do is point to the quality difference in everything downstream once the foundation is solid. That’s the argument worth making to your leadership team before you start.

Need help building the foundation, not just running the campaigns?

I work with B2B companies and small marketing teams to put the right infrastructure in place: conversation mapping, positioning, content strategy, and website architecture, so that every tactic you run has something solid underneath it.Let’s talk about where to start

Or see how I’ve applied this approach in practice on the case studies page.

How Solo B2B Marketers Build the Right Resource Mix

Posted on by
Worm's eye view of a forest canopy representing a marketing resource ecosystem.

Updated March, 2026

Part 2 of the Solo Marketer Playbook series. This post covers how to identify your resource gaps and fill them strategically — with the right internal allies and the right external partners. Start with Part 1: Being a one-person marketing department if you haven’t already.

One of the first things to reckon with as a one-person or small-staff B2B marketing department is this: you were not hired to do everything yourself. You were hired to make sure everything gets done. That is a meaningful distinction, and it changes how you think about building your resource model.

The most effective solo marketers I have worked with are not the ones who work the most hours or try to develop expertise in every discipline. They are the ones who are honest about where their knowledge and skills are strong, where they are thin, and how to build a network of internal and external resources that fills those gaps intentionally.

This matters more than most leaders realize. 6sense’s 2024 B2B Buyer Experience Report, which surveyed over 2,500 B2B buyers, found that 81% of buyers have already selected a preferred vendor before ever talking to a sales rep. Your marketing has to be doing real work long before a salesperson enters the picture. That takes infrastructure, strategy, and the right mix of people behind it — not just hustle.

This post covers the five major capability areas where solo marketers most often need to fill gaps, and the internal and external resources best suited to each.

Start Here: Insider or Outsider?

Before discussing resources, it helps to be honest about where you are starting from. In my experience, most solo B2B marketers fall into one of two categories, and each comes with different strengths and different gaps to fill.

If you have been inside the company for a while, or come from the same industry at another company, you likely have strong market intuition: you understand the buyer, the competitive landscape, and the language of the space. Your gaps tend to be on the marketing operations side: execution systems, MarTech, channel expertise.

If you came from outside the industry, you may bring strong marketing craft and operational skill, but need to build market knowledge quickly. Your gaps tend to be on the strategic and insights side: understanding what your buyers actually care about, how they make decisions, and what genuinely differentiates your company.

Neither starting point is better. But being clear about which one describes you determines where to focus your resource-building energy first.

Building Your Internal Resource Network

Whether you are an insider or an outsider, one of the highest-leverage things you can do early is build a strong internal network. This is not about politics. It is about identifying the people inside your organization who can make your marketing meaningfully better, and cultivating those relationships deliberately.

There are three types of internal resources worth building:

Advisors

These are the people inside your company who genuinely understand your market, your customers, and what makes your company valuable. They do not always have senior titles. A customer service rep who talks to 20 customers a week often has sharper buyer insight than anyone in leadership. A technical specialist who presents at conferences has a feel for what the market is thinking. Cast a wide net. Do not let management funnel you only toward the obvious choices. The best advisors are often found in unexpected places.

Use these people as sounding boards for strategy and messaging. Bring them into workshops. Their unfiltered perspective on what customers actually say is worth more than any market research report.

Content providers

Subject matter experts are a critical internal resource for content, but they come with a consistent challenge: they tend to write in product language, not customer language. They focus on speeds and feeds, technical specifications, and features rather than the problems customers are trying to solve. Part of your job is to channel their expertise through your customer conversation mapping and messaging framework so the output actually connects with buyers. More on content resources in the section below.

Advocates

Marketing is chronically undervalued in many B2B organizations. Leadership often sees the budget and struggles to connect it to visible revenue. Sales takes the credit for wins. Your job is to cultivate people inside the organization who understand marketing’s role and will go to bat for you when it counts.

You need at least three categories of internal advocates:

  • One strong voice in sales leadership. This person has to be aligned with you on how marketing and sales divide accountability — what leads marketing will deliver, what sales will do with them, and how you both measure results. Sales cannot simply reject anything short of a purchase-ready lead. Every lead tells you something about where a buyer is in the journey, and that information has value even when it does not immediately convert.
  • A senior leadership sponsor. Unless you are in senior leadership yourself, you need someone at that level who understands what marketing is doing, why, and what to expect. Keep them informed. Set realistic expectations. Make sure they can explain marketing’s contribution to the business when it comes up in leadership conversations.
  • A few strong individual sales contributors. Beyond sales leadership, a handful of salespeople who see marketing as genuinely helpful, and who share that view with their peers, can shift the culture around how your function is perceived.

One structural approach worth considering: form a small marketing advisory committee from these groups and hold a brief quarterly briefing. Keeping advocates informed and involved is much easier when it is built into a regular cadence rather than handled reactively.

Building Your External Resource Network

Internal resources give you depth and organizational context. External resources give you specialized expertise, market perspective, and execution capacity you cannot build in-house. Here is how to think about each category.

Your customers

The most underutilized external resource for any solo marketer is the customers themselves. Make a point of doing at least one customer call per week. Not a sales call. A genuine conversation to understand what they value about your company, why they bought, and what could be better. I call this framework “What we do well” and “Even better if.” The answers will shape your messaging, your content, and your positioning more reliably than any vendor-supplied market research.

Industry media contacts

The editors and sales representatives at publications covering your market are a surprisingly valuable external resource.

  • They talk to dozens of companies in your space every week.
  • They see how your competitors are positioning themselves.
  • They know what questions buyers are asking and what content is getting traction.

A 30-minute conversation with an editor or media rep gives you a market intelligence briefing that is hard to replicate any other way. This is not about pitching coverage. It is about using those relationships to stay informed.

Market and marketing consultants

This is where the most important. and most frequently misunderstood, external investment decisions get made. The B2B marketing agency landscape is vast, and most of it is generalist. For a solo marketer trying to fill specific, high-stakes gaps, choosing the wrong type of outside partner is an expensive mistake.

When I use the phrase “market and marketing consultant,” I mean something specific: an individual or firm with deep experience in your particular industry or market segment. Not just a firm that knows how to run campaigns, but one that knows your buyer, speaks their language, and can bring genuine market insight to the engagement — not just execution. Sagefrog’s 2026 B2B Marketing Mix research found that 76% of B2B companies say agency support helps them meet their marketing goals, but that outcome depends heavily on finding a partner who is genuinely calibrated to your market — not one who will wait for you to tell them what to do.

The Five Capability Areas and Where to Find Help

With that framing in place, here is how to think about resourcing each of the five major capability areas a solo B2B marketing department has to cover.

1. High-level marketing strategy and market knowledge

If your gap is market knowledge, the best outside resource is a consultant or firm that specializes specifically in your industry. General marketing strategy consultants can help you build frameworks, but they cannot tell you what your particular buyers care about. Industry-specialist consultants can. Look for someone who brings you insight and leads the work — not someone who waits for instructions.

2. Customer-facing messaging

Never develop messaging entirely in-house. The risk of tainting it with internal assumptions, what you think your value is rather than what buyers actually experience, is too high. Bring in an outside market consultant to facilitate the process, conduct any qualitative research, and write or supervise the writing of actual messaging. Your internal advisors (especially salespeople and product experts who spend real time with customers) should participate as key stakeholders. Anyone else in the room is a potential distraction.

The output of this work, your conversation maps and messaging framework, becomes the foundation for everything downstream. Cutting corners here means cutting corners on every campaign, every piece of content, and every sales conversation that follows. For a full breakdown of what this foundational work involves, see the post on the B2B marketing investments you cannot skip.

3. Content creation

For content, you have three viable options, each with tradeoffs:

  • Internal subject matter experts: often the most knowledgeable source, but reliably prone to writing in product language rather than customer language. You will need to redirect their output through your messaging framework to make it usable.
  • External freelance writers: a strong option if you can find writers with real experience in your industry. Several platforms exist to help you find and vet candidates. It can be hit or miss, but the right freelance writer with both industry knowledge and customer-facing writing instincts is one of the highest-value resources a solo marketer can find.
  • Your market or marketing consultant: a firm that specializes in your industry will often have writers available who can interview your subject matter experts and produce content that is both technically credible and customer-facing. This tends to be the most reliable option when both industry knowledge and message alignment matter.

4. Media and campaign execution

Media planning, buying, placement, tracking, and reporting is time-intensive, technically complex, and benefits significantly from relationships and accumulated data that outside agencies build over time. My strong recommendation for most solo marketers is to use an external source for this. Your time is better spent on messaging, content, and strategy — the work that requires your specific knowledge of the business.

When evaluating external media partners, the key distinction is between generalist B2B marketing agencies and boutique B2B marketing partners who specialize in your industry or market. Generalist agencies typically bring strong programmatic and paid search capabilities and a more structured account management process, but they tend to work from your inputs rather than bringing independent market insight. Boutique partners tend to bring deeper knowledge of your specific buyers and media landscape, suggest a more integrated mix of tactics, and provide more granular expectations around performance. Neither is universally better. The right choice depends on where your own gaps are most acute and how much weight you need a partner to carry versus how much you can direct yourself.

In either case, understand your standing before you sign. Are you a small account in a large agency’s roster, or a meaningful client in a boutique firm’s portfolio? It matters for the level of attention and responsiveness you will actually receive.

5. Lead generation, management, and nurturing

These three functions are often treated as one topic but require genuinely different types of knowledge and skill.

Lead generation overlaps with your media and campaign work: the same external resources apply. The meaningful difference is that generalist agencies tend to lean heavily on programmatic tactics, while boutique market partners tend to recommend a more balanced approach across direct digital, content promotion, events, and programmatic.

Lead management is primarily a technology and process problem. It requires alignment with sales leadership on how leads are graded, assigned, and followed up. If you are setting this up without prior experience, find a vendor or consultant with specific expertise in your industry’s sales motion. Whether that involves direct sales, distributors, manufacturer reps, or some combination. The structure of your sales channels has to be reflected in how your lead management system is configured.

Lead nurturing is where the most confusion, and the most misleading vendor pitches, exist. Many consultants will tell you they offer lead nurture when what they are actually describing is marketing automation: drip campaigns sent to existing leads. Marketing automation is a tool for nurturing leads you have already identified. It is not a lead generation mechanism, and loading purchased lists into an automation platform is not nurturing. True lead nurture is a coordinated mix of touchpoints — email, content, events, phone calls, direct mail where appropriate — working together over time to keep your company relevant to prospects who are not yet ready to buy. The external partners worth engaging are the ones who think about it that way, not the ones who are essentially selling you a software implementation.

For the measurement infrastructure that ties all of this together, the post on choosing the right conversion attribution model walks through how to think about proving marketing’s contribution across the full lead lifecycle.

A Note on Hiring

One option conspicuously absent from most of the above: making a new hire to fill a gap. In most of the capability areas covered here, a new hire is not the right first move. The candidates with enough expertise to actually move the needle in areas like market strategy or messaging are typically senior enough that they would be in your position at another company. They are expensive, and the honest truth is that working through the process described in this series will build your own knowledge enough that you will be a much better judge of what kind of hire you actually need and when.

The exception is marketing operations talent: people who can run specific tools and execution functions. Those roles are more clearly scoped, easier to evaluate, and often more cost-effective to hire than to outsource at scale.

Not sure where your biggest gaps are?

I work with B2B companies and small marketing teams to audit what is in place, identify what is missing, and build a practical resourcing plan that fits the budget and timeline. No generic frameworks — just clear-eyed assessment based on your specific market and business situation. Let’s talk through where you are

Being a one-person marketing department

Posted on by Leave a comment
Victoria Anders hiking near an alpine lake in Washington state

How to Do It All Without Burning Out

Part 1 of the Solo Marketer Playbook series. This post covers the reality of being a one-person marketing department: what you’re up against and how to build a framework for success. Subsequent posts go deeper on specific tactics.

You are responsible for all of it. Strategy. Execution. Budget. Measurement. Content. Demand generation. Brand. And somehow — sales alignment too. If you’re reading this as a one-person marketing department or a very small marketing team, you already know this feeling: the job description is effectively “everything,” and there is never enough time, budget, or backup.

You are not alone, and you are not failing. You’re navigating one of the most structurally difficult roles in modern business. This series of articles is built specifically for you, drawing on real lessons from my time running one-person B2B marketing operations and working inside small marketing agencies.

Let’s start with the honest truth about what you’re dealing with.

The Real Scope of a One-Person Marketing Department

Before we talk about solutions, let’s name the actual scope of what’s being asked of you. Just the MarTech landscape alone has exploded to over 8,000 available solutions (and that number has only grown). Evaluating tools is practically a job in itself.

But the tool sprawl is just the beginning. A fully functioning B2B marketing operation requires competence across all of the following disciplines:

  • Marketing strategy and planning
  • Market research and competitive analysis
  • Market segmentation and buyer persona development
  • Pain point and value proposition identification
  • Message mapping and brand voice development
  • Customer and prospect communications
  • Branding and visual identity governance
  • Media research, planning, and buying
  • Media execution and performance tracking
  • Marketing automation and lead nurturing
  • Content strategy and creation (blog, video, email, social)
  • Paid advertising and ad creative
  • Demand and lead generation programs
  • Lead delivery and CRM coordination with sales
  • Marketing performance measurement and reporting

That’s the full scope of what an enterprise marketing department employs entire teams to handle, and it lands on your desk. With a fraction of the budget. Often without dedicated support from the broader organization.

“The one-person marketing department isn’t a reduced version of marketing. It’s full-service marketing with reduced resources. That distinction matters enormously when it comes to setting expectations and building a strategy.”

The Four Hard Truths Solo Marketers Face

In my experience, one-person marketing departments consistently run into the same four structural challenges. Recognizing them clearly is the first step to working around them.

1. You can’t short-change the full scope without short-changing results

The temptation is to pick a few things and let everything else slide. Sometimes that’s the right call, but it carries real consequences. Skipping brand consistency erodes trust. Skipping measurement means you can’t defend your budget. Skipping nurture means leads go cold. Part of succeeding as a one-person team is making deliberate trade-offs, not accidental ones.

2. The knowledge and skill requirements span too many disciplines to master alone

Modern B2B marketing sits at the intersection of data analytics, creative production, technology, copywriting, strategy, and sales alignment. HubSpot’s annual State of Marketing report consistently shows that even well-staffed teams struggle to cover all of these areas effectively. No single person is world-class across all of it, and that’s fine. The goal isn’t to master everything; it’s to build the right mix of in-house skills, agency partners, and tools that fill the gaps intentionally.

3. You’re getting pitched constantly, and you don’t always have the context to evaluate what you’re being sold

Agencies and vendors know that solo marketers and small teams are overwhelmed and often lack specialized benchmarks. You get pitched on SEO, paid search, account-based marketing, lead generation, and marketing automation. It’s genuinely hard to know what’s worth the investment, who’s trustworthy, and where to start given your specific business context and budget.

4. Time is the real constraint, not just budget

Even the most committed solo marketer has limits. You can work extra hours, but you can’t manufacture more hours. This means ruthless prioritization isn’t optional; it’s the core discipline. Every “yes” to a new initiative is a “no” to something else, and the cost of that trade-off has to be made explicitly.

Where to Start When Everything Feels Urgent

The question I get most often from one-person marketing departments isn’t “what should I do?” It’s “what should I do first?“

Here’s the prioritization framework I use with clients:

Foundation before tactics

Before you run campaigns, you need anchors: a clear value proposition, defined target segments, and a consistent brand voice. If these don’t exist yet, or exist only in someone’s head, no amount of tactical execution will produce reliable results. These are unglamorous investments, but they are the ones that make everything else work. I cover exactly which foundational investments you can’t afford to skip in a dedicated post in this series.

Revenue-connected activities before brand-building

When budget and time are constrained, prioritize activities that can be traced to revenue: demand generation, lead nurturing, and sales enablement content. Brand work is important, but it tends to be longer-cycle. Connect your near-term marketing to near-term business outcomes first.

Measurement infrastructure before scale

Before you scale anything (more channels, more spend, more content), make sure you can measure it. Even simple tracking (UTMs, basic attribution, lead source reporting) gives you the data you need to defend your decisions and optimize over time. Flying blind is expensive. If you want to go deeper on how search, intent, and measurement connect into a unified growth strategy, my post on a holistic approach to search and growth is a good next read.

Fill the gaps with partners, not just tools

No tool solves a knowledge problem. If you don’t have deep expertise in paid search, buying more AdWords budget won’t fix that. A trusted agency partner or specialist will. Be selective about where you invest in human expertise versus automation.

What This Series Covers

This is the first post in an ongoing series specifically built for one-person and small-team marketers. Future posts will go deep on the specific, actionable pieces of building a solo marketing operation that delivers real results. Topics include:

  • Filling the gaps: how to identify where you need outside help and how to evaluate and vet agencies and freelancers
  • Defining what success looks like: how to set expectations with leadership and build measurement frameworks that keep you accountable to the right things
  • The marketing investments you can’t skip: even on a tight budget, some things are non-negotiable; here’s what they are and why
  • Content strategy for one: how to build a content operation that doesn’t require a full editorial team

Up next in the series:Managing Multiple Clients →

Ready to build a smarter solo marketing operation?

I work directly with B2B companies and small marketing teams to cut through the noise and build marketing strategies that actually drive results, without requiring an army to execute them.Let’s talk about your marketing challenges →

Or explore case studies to see how I’ve helped businesses like yours.

Managing Multiple Clients

Posted on by Leave a comment

When I was the creative lead for multiple clients, I was often tasked with considering what a client needs, understanding what they want to achieve, and balancing it with limited resources.

It was inevitable when managing multiple clients that a disruptive situation with one of the clients would occur. How would one handle that situation while still providing an exemplary level of service for all the other clients?

Here’s an example of a disruptive situation that occurred about year ago when a project manager inadvertently overlooked a client’s pressing timeline. The client grew increasingly concerned about making the deadline due to the potential for lost revenue. A good way to ease the client’s mind is to tailor a plan of action specific to their needs.

Always take careful consideration not to disrupt other clients’ timelines and put together an adjunct team to ensure not only that you can meet the deadline, but to delight the client!